Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.K.PANIGRAHI
Ranjan Kumar Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case regarding recovery orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding compliance with orissa forest code. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. court's analysis of delays in disciplinary proceedings. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. conclusion and order to allow the writ petition. (Para 22) |
ORDER :
2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the orders dated 18.04.2006, 19.04.2006, 20.04.2006 & 21.04.2006 passed by the Opposite Party No.2 i.e., Conservator of Forest, Bolangir Kenduleaf Circle in Annexure 4 to 7. The petition calls into question the action of Opposite Party No.2 in rejecting the four sets of appeal filed by the Petitioner in one day and the initiation of order of recovery of withheld vouchers as the same is in contravention to Rule 346 (2) of the Orissa Forest Department Code .
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the substratum of matter presented before this Court is that the Petitioner while working as Range Officer under the administrative control of the DFO Patnagarh Kenduleaf Division, had executed field operations in the range. While rendering monthly cash accounts, some objections were rais
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
