SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 702

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
K.R.MOHAPATRA
Rama Chandra Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Jadu Simadri – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Manoj Mishra, Mr. Tanmay Mishra, Advocate

Table of Content
1. procedural history of the case and applications. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding the application of lis pendens. (Para 4)
3. application of section 52 and doctrine of lis pendens. (Para 5)
4. conclusion and dismissal of the cmp. (Para 6 , 7)

ORDER :

2. Petitioner in this CMP seeks to assail the order dated 12th September, 2009 (Annexure-7) passed in RFA No. 2 of 2019, whereby learned District Judge, Ganjam at Berhampur rejected an application filed by the Petitioner-Appellant under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to incorporate the prayer ‘to declare the Regd. Sale deed being document No. 11841900780 of 2019 be decreed as null and void’.

“5. In the circumstance, this Court finds, there is no proper application of mind in considering the application by the lower appellate court. In the process and as there is necessity of inclusion of such party at least for the purpose of injunction, this Court allowing the application for bringing the new party as Respondent nos. 21 & 22, also directs the Appellants to file amended cause title in the memorandum of appeal at least within a period of seven working days. Upon bringing the amended cause title, the lower appellate court shall iss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top