SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 1092

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P.ROUTRAY, CHITTARANJAN DASH
Nurabati Barik – Appellant
Versus
Hemanta Barik – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. J.R. Deo, Advocate

Table of Content
1. wife's claim for permanent alimony post-divorce. (Para 3 , 4)
2. rights to claim maintenance under multiple statutes. (Para 5 , 6)
3. fixing maintenance amount based on income disclosure. (Para 7)
4. final order for maintenance payment to wife. (Para 8)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. J.R. Deo, learned counsel for the Appellant-Wife.

3. Present appeal has been directed by the Wife against impugned judgment dated 27.12.2021 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Sambalpur in C.P. Case No.26 of 2019.

5. It is well settled in law that, payment of maintenance under different statutes are at the choice of the party subject to adjustment of the amount of maintenance granted in any other proceeding. The maintenance application decided under one statute would not foreclose the claim for maintenance under another statute. If maintenance has been awarded under one of the statutes that by itself though would not preclude the claimant from raising claim for maintenance under a different statute, but the rider is that the claimant has to disclose all such facts in the subsequent proceeding, and in such case the court entertaining the prayer for maintenance in subsequent proceeding had to ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top