Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
G.SATAPATHY
Akshya Ray – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of criminal proceedings based on alleged offenses. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners seek to quash proceedings due to amicable settlement. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioners argue settlement warrants quashing of proceedings. (Para 4) |
| 4. state contends non-compoundable offenses cannot be quashed. (Para 5) |
| 5. court assesses nature of charges and public interest in prosecution. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 6. jurisdiction under section 482 cr.p.c. explained regarding quashing. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 7. guidelines established for quashing non-compoundable offenses. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 8. court's refusal to quash proceedings based on the nature of crimes. (Para 15) |
| 9. final conclusion: crlmc dismissed; proceedings not quashed. (Para 16) |
ORDER :
1. The petitioners herein by an application U/S. 482 Cr.P.C. have sought for to quash the criminal proceeding initiated against them in Bari Ramchandrapur P.S. Case No. 13(7) dated 14.02.2007 for commission of offences U/Ss. 452/379/427/323/307/34 of I.P.C. read with Section 9 (B) of I.E. Act and 127(A) of R.P. Act on the ground of settlement dispute amicably amongst themselves.
Basing on the report(F.I.R.) of the informant, Bari Ramchandrapur P.S. Case No. 13(7) of 20
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
