SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 620

ALOK SINGH
Sonu Alias Rinku Alias Lambu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that earlier an FIR was registered against petitioner and other co-accused for an offence punishable under Sections 382, 34 IPC; petitioner was enlarged on regular bail; however, during the investigation Section 397 IPC was also added against the petitioner and other co-accused. Learned counsel has further stated that an offence under Section 397 IPC is punishable with maximum imprisonment for 7 years and is not punishable with death or life imprisonment. Therefore, on furnishing bail bonds for the newly added offence, petitioner should be allowed to continue on bail and he is not supposed to seek fresh bail for the added section.

2. Notice of motion.

3. On being asked, Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, Addl. AG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent - State,

4. With the consent of both the counsel, present petition is being disposed of finally today itself.

5. Perusal of the record reveal that earlier FIR No.58 dated 3.6.2010at Police Station Division No. 8, Ludhiana was registered against the petitioner and other co-accused for an offence under Sections 382, 34 IPC. Petitioner was enlarged on regular bail, however, subsequently, during











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top