SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 545

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Kulwant Kaur Padda – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of Patiala – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 18.12.2009 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Bathinda by which affidavit dated 03.08.2009 (Ex.P1/A) filed by the petitioner/landlady Kulwant Kaur in her examination-in-chief has been ordered to be de-exhibited.

2. In brief, the petitioner/landlady filed a petition under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 [for short "the Act"] on 19.11.2008 to seek eviction of the respondent from the demised premises, in which initially an application filed by the respondent for leave to defend was dismissed on 12.03.2009 and the order of eviction was passed, but that order was reversed by this Court in CR No. 1821 of 2009, decided on 18.05.2009, with a direction to the learned Rent Controller to decide the case within six months. Consequently, written statement was filed by the respondent and while leading her evidence, the petitioner/landlady filed her affidavit in examination-in-chief, on which she was cross-examined. Thereafter, the respondent examined their witnesses and after the evidence of both the parties, case was fixed for arguments. At this stage, the respondent


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top