SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 220

K.KANNAN
Sukhbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Mehar – Respondent


Judgment

K.Kannan, J.

1. The appeal is by the owner and the driver of the truck which was involved in an accident in a collision with a bus belonging to the UP Roadways. The deceased was a gratuitous passenger in the truck. The Insurance Company of the truck was, therefore, discharged from liability and the owner of the vehicle alone was found responsible. I cannot fault the liability cast on the owner of the truck.

2. The learned counsel for the appellants, however, argues that in a case of a head- on collision between two vehicles, there was no justification for finding the driver of the truck to be solely responsible for the accident. Such a finding had been entered by the Tribunal for the only reason that the driver had run away from the spot and, therefore, the Tribunal took the negligence of the driver to be fully established. I cannot make such an inference and in a case of head-on collision, I will place the responsibility for both the drivers. The owner of the bus is equally responsible for the amount determined by the Tribunal and it shall be shared as 50:50 with the owner of the truck. The award of the Tribunal is, under the circumstances, modified to apportion the liabil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top