SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(P&H) 84

ALOK SINGH
Jagbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Alok Singh, J.

1. This revision petition is filed by the revisionist - petitioner against the judgment dated 11.11.2010 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Sonepat, as well as judgment dated 2.1.2008 passed by the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Sonepat, whereby petitioner is convicted under Sections 325/323/148 IPC and was awarded sentence of one year under Section 325 IPC and fine of Rs. 2000/-, six months under Section 323 IPC and fine of Rs. 500/- and six months under Section 148 IPC and fine of Rs. 500/-.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner does not challenge the conviction of the petitioner. He further states that since sentence awarded is one year, hence, petitioner is liable to be released on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act. Considering totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, while maintaining the conviction of the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that petitioner be released on probation under Section 4(1) of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, for a period of five months on furnishing his personal bond and undertaking with one surety to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top