2010 Supreme(P&H) 3348
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Alok Singh, J.
Nisha
Versus
Mahan
Civil Revision No. 7924 of 2010,
Decided On : DECEMBER 16, 2010
The main legal point established is that a mutual decree for dissolution of marriage under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act can be recalled under Section 151 CPC if fraud is proven, and the requirements of Section 13-B must be duly pleaded and proved to maintain a petition.
Headnote:
Article 227 - Divorce Decree - Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13-B - 13B
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner-wife sought to recall a divorce decree, alleging that wrong averments were made in the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and wrong statements were given before the Court.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the requirements of Section 13-B of the Act were duly pleaded and proved, and the decree for dissolution of marriage was granted within the Court's jurisdiction. The Court also rejected the petitioner's claim of fraud and coercion in obtaining the decree.
Issues: The issues involved the validity of the divorce decree under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and the petitioner's allegations of fraud and coercion.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized that to maintain a petition under Section 13-B of the Act, the parties must prove three key ingredients: living separately for a year or more, inability to live together, and mutual agreement for dissolution of marriage. The Court also held that a mutual decree for dissolution of marriage can be recalled under Section 151 CPC if fraud was proven.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petitioner's plea to recall the divorce decree, affirming the validity of the decree granted under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Alok Singh, J.
1. Petitioner-wife has invoked supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 24.8.2010 passed by Addl. District Judge, Rohtak thereby rejecting the application moved by the wife for recalling the divorce decree dated 10.10.2006.
2. The brief facts inter alia are that marriage between the parties was solemnized on 15.1.2001 as per hindu rites and ceremonies. Both the parties started living together and child namely Nancy was born out of this wedlock on 1.10.2002. Both the parties have filed joint petition under Section 13(B) of Hindu Marriage Act before the Court below on 23.3.2006. Both the parties have signed the petition under Section 13-B of the Act. After expiry of statuary period of 6 months statements on oath of both the parties were recorded by the Court below on 25.5.2006. Both the parties have stated on oath before the Court below that from 5.1.2005 parties are residing separately and despite of best efforts for re-conciliation made by family members, relatives and the parties, re-conciliation is not possible, hence, they have amicably agreed for divorce by mutual consent. Ultimately divorce decree was passed by the Court below on 10.10.2006. Petitioner- wife, thereafter, moved an application under Section 151 CPC for recalling the judgment dated 18.10.2006 on the ground that wrong averments were made in the petition under Section 13-B of the Act and wrong statements were given before the Court below to the effect that parties are living separately, although parties were living together under Dne roof.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment of learned Single Judge of Orissa High Court in the case of Smt. Puspalata Rout v. Damodar Rout, C.R. No.469 of 1984 decided on 15.5.1986 and argued that a mutual decree for divorce under Section 13-B of the Act can be recalled under Section 151 CPC. There is no doubt about the legal preposition that mutual decree for dissolution of marriage passed under Section 13-B of the Act can be recalled while invoking Section 151 CPC on proving that fraud was played while getting the decree for dissolution of marriage.
5. I am in full agreement with learned Single Judge of Orissa High Court that if petition under Section 13-B of the Act was itself not maintainable then decree for dissolution of marriage on a petition which itself was not maintainable can be recalled under Section 151 CPC.
6. Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act reads as under:-
"13B. Divorce by mutual consent.- (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living separately for a period of one year or more, that they have not been able to live together and that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved.
(2) On the motion of both the parties made not earlier than six months after the date of the presentation of the petition referred to in sub-section (1) and not later than eighteen months after the said date, if the petition is not withdrawn in the meantime, the court shall, on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and after making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with effect from the date of decree."
7. To maintain the petition under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, three ingredients must be pleaded and proved which are as under:-
(a) Parties to the divorce petition have been living separately from one year or more.
(b) They have not been able to live togeth