SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 3366

RAM CHAND GUPTA
Kaptan @ Parveen – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Ram Chand Gupta, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 3(1)(c) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 (for short the Act) for release of the petitioner on agricultural parole.

2. Reply has been filed on behalf of respondent-State. Custody certificate has also been produced and the same is taken on record.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record.

4. Admitted facts are that, petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life in FIR No. 264 dated 23.05.2003, under Sections 148/149/302/307/333/353/186 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak vide order dated 11.08.2008. He filed appeal against the said judgment, which was dismissed by this Court. Now petitioner is undergoing the sentence in the District Jail, Narnaul. He has already undergone 7 years 5 months and 14 days of sentence excluding parole. He has undergone more than 2 years 4 months and 6 days of sentence after conviction. He has earlier availed parole of one week from 04.06.2009 to 1















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top