SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 3182

M.M.S.BEDI
Rajinder Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

M.M.S.BEDI, J.

1. This order will dispose of three revision petitions bearing CRR Nos. 1884, 2047 and 2575 of 2010, questioning the legality and propriety of the order dated May 17, 2010 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, allowing the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning petitioners Gurcharan Singh and others in Crl. Rev. No. 1884 of 2010 and Gurdev Singh and others in CRR No. 2047 of 2010. The third revision petition has been filed by Rajinder Pal Singh, complainant impugning the same order by virtue of which Kartar Singh has been left to be summoned under Section 319 Cr.P.C.

2. The learned trial Court has observed hat since the solitary statement of witness can be made basis for conviction, as such there are reasonable grounds to summon the petitioners to face trial alongwith other accused.

3. Briefly stated the case of the prosecution as per the statement to Rajinder Pal Singh is to the effect that his father is having a dispute of land measuring 84 kanals 10 marlas with his brother Amar Singh, Prithi Singh and nephew Gulzar Singh, Rishala Singh sons of Kartar Singh and that they are in possession of the said land and the High Court has stayed the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top