SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 3131

A.N.JINDAL
Satnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

A.N.Jindal, J.

1. Satnam Singh accused-appellant (herein referred as the accused) has preferred an appeal against the judgment dated 01.04.2002, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, convicting and sentencing him as under :-

Under Section Sentence 307 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- 323 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- 324 and 498-A IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each.

2 The complainant Surjit Kaur (herein referred as the complainant) lodged the case against the accused (her own husband) on the allegations that she was working as a lady health visitor and was married to the accused about sixteen years prior to the occurrence. From the marriage, a daughter namely Preet Sandhu was born. They were residing together at Kothi No. 74/2, Garden Colony, Jalandhar. She has levelled allegations that after ten years of the marriage, the accused had started compelling her to bring Rs. 5,00,000/- from her parents in lieu of the plot which she had inherited from her father by way of will . He also compelled her to part with all



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top