A.N.JINDAL
Satnam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
A.N.Jindal, J.
1. Satnam Singh accused-appellant (herein referred as the accused) has preferred an appeal against the judgment dated 01.04.2002, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, convicting and sentencing him as under :-
Under Section Sentence 307 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- 323 IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- 324 and 498-A IPC Rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each.
2 The complainant Surjit Kaur (herein referred as the complainant) lodged the case against the accused (her own husband) on the allegations that she was working as a lady health visitor and was married to the accused about sixteen years prior to the occurrence. From the marriage, a daughter namely Preet Sandhu was born. They were residing together at Kothi No. 74/2, Garden Colony, Jalandhar. She has levelled allegations that after ten years of the marriage, the accused had started compelling her to bring Rs. 5,00,000/- from her parents in lieu of the plot which she had inherited from her father by way of will . He also compelled her to part with all
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.