L.N.MITTAL
Chief Administrator, Huda – Appellant
Versus
Satpal – Respondent
L.N.Mittal, J.
1. Defendants No. 2 to 4 i.e. Chief Administrator, Administrator and Estate Officer of Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) have filed the instant revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. Suit was filed by respondent/plaintiff Satpal against State of Haryana defendant No. 1 and against the petitioners as defendants No. 2 to 4. Learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panchkula vide judgment and decree dated 20.11.2006, Annexure P/1, decreed the suit. Defendants No. 2 to 4 filed first appeal on 26.5.2009 against judgment and decree of the trial court. Along with first appeal, defendants No. 2 to 4 made application under section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning delay of 873 days in filing the said appeal. Learned Additional District Judge, Panchkula vide judgment and decree dated 28.10.2009, Annexure P/2, dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the first appeal and consequently dismissed the first appeal as well. Feeling aggrieved, defendants No. 2 to 4 filed RSA No. 2186 of 2010 in this Court. However, vide order dated 30.6.2010, Annexure P
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.