SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2874

NIRMALJIT KAUR
Satpal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Nirmaljit Kaur, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No. 29 dated 17.02.2009 registered at Police Station Salem Tabri, Ludhiana under Sections 51, 52, 63 and 64 of the Copyright Act, 1957 read with Section 420 IPC and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent No. 3, complainant Chamkaur Singh was the employer of petitioner No. 1 who was working under him as Manager for five years from the year 2001 to 2006. Petitioner No. 2 was also working as his Distributor and therefore, both the petitioners are known to each other. Respondent No. 3 was running an Ayurvedic Centre and manufacturing Ayurvedic drugs under License No. 573-AY-PB Crl. Misc. No. M-23090 of 2009 2 issued under the Drugs & Cosmetics Act, 1940 by the Ayurvedic Department of the Government of Punjab.

3. It was contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner No. 1 left the employment of respondent No. 3 in 2006. Thereafter, he joined Chander Shekhar to set up similar manufacturing of Ayurvedic medicines under license in village and Post Office Kuthar Kalan, District Una under the name and title of M/s Ayushkti Pharm






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top