SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2885

RAKESH KUMAR GARG
Rajinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Satish Garg – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Garg, J.

1. This is defendants second appeal challenging the judgment and decrees of the Courts below whereby suit of the plaintiff-respondent for possession was decreed.

2. In brief, the case of the plaintiff-respondent is that one Ripudaman Kaur Aulakh was the allottee of the suit property vide allotment letter dated 5.6.1965. After her death, the suit property was inherited by the plaintiff-Kumar Mohan Singh Aulakh and his brother Dr. Jagat Mohan Singh Aulakh and ownership was changed in their names vide memo dated 6.7.2000 issued by the Estate Officer, HUDA. The plaintiff constructed a small dwelling unit and a boundary wall and installed a gate on the suit premises. The appellants had unauthorizedly entered into the premises owned by the plaintiff by breaking open the locks and had started living in the suit property. The complaint in this regard was also filed on 31.8.2000. An FIR No.721 dated 25.11.2002 was registered against the appellants with the intervention of this Court. Request of the plaintiff to the appellants to vacate the suit premises carried no fruit. Accordingly, the suit was filed.

3. Upon notice, the appellants filed written statement rai





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top