JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Dharamvir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
Jitendra Chauhan, J.
1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 8/11.5.2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat (for short `the trial Court), whereby the accused/appellant has been convicted for the offence and sentenced as under :-
Section 392 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/- or in default of payment of fine to further undergone for a period of one year. Section 394 IPC To undergo for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-or in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. Section 397 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- or in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years.
2 Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 27.11.1999, ASI Virender Singh was going towards Kishora turn in connection with patrolling alongwith other police officials. He saw there a maruti car by the side of road and also noticed an injured person, who was lying in the ditches. ASI Virender Singh picked up the i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.