SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2924

JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Dharamvir – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Jitendra Chauhan, J.

1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 8/11.5.2001 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat (for short `the trial Court), whereby the accused/appellant has been convicted for the offence and sentenced as under :-

Section 392 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/- or in default of payment of fine to further undergone for a period of one year. Section 394 IPC To undergo for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/-or in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. Section 397 IPC To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- or in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years.

2 Brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 27.11.1999, ASI Virender Singh was going towards Kishora turn in connection with patrolling alongwith other police officials. He saw there a maruti car by the side of road and also noticed an injured person, who was lying in the ditches. ASI Virender Singh picked up the i




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top