SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2799

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
M.M.Kumar and A.N.Jindal JJ.
Jullundur District Co-operative Agricultural Service Societies Employees Union (Regd.)
Versus
State Of Punjab And Others
C.W.P. No. 12820 of 1999,
Decided On : OCTOBER 1, 2010

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India, 1950 , Arts.14 & 226--Punjab State Cooperative Societies Act , S.22(1) & 85--Punjab Sate Co-operative Agricultural Service Societies Service Rules 1997, R.19 and 14--Reduction of pay--No rule could be framed or executive instructions be issued reducing the pay of an employee particularly when under the 1997 Rules it is considered as penal action--No onerous condition could be imposed upon them by framing any rule, which would reduce their salary--A contract of employment soon assumes the character of status where terms and conditions of service could be unilaterally changed by the amendment or the rules--But still it would be impermissible for a Public Company or a Society to proceed in a manner so as to violate Article 14 of the Constitution which require that all Public Companies--Societies and Corporations are expected to act fairly incorporation of Rule 19(b), restricting the payment of salary to the employees of the Society(s) to 75% of net profit is absolutely without any justification and cannot be sustained in the eyes of law such an amendment cannot meet the approval of Article 14 of the Constitution is liable to be set aside. (Paras 24 & 25)

       (B) Constitution of India, 1950 , Art.14 and 226--Punjab State Cooperative Societies Act, S.22(1) & 85--Whether converting the tenure of service of a Salesman retiring him at the age of 60 in accordance with Rule 19 of the 1997 Rules to that of unsalaried employee by paying commission on sale transaction effected by him is permissible--Converting the post of a Salesmen into an engagement on the basis of commission or retainership would result into arbitrariness with against public policy because the post of Salesmen is a cadre post with specified scale of pay , as is evident from the perusal of Appendix A read with Rule 7 of the 1997 Rules--Moreover, those who are permanent Salesmen they would be deprived of salary on the basis of regular pay scale and even their pension and other pensionary benefits might be adversely affected--Impugned instructions or even the amendment quashed--Respondents are directed to pay petitioners salary in accordance with the post held by them--Those who have retired, they should be paid their dues in accordance with the rules applicable to them by giving them the benefit of refixation of their pay in accordance with the prevalent rules. (Paras 27 & 28)

       

Judgment

M.M.Kumar, J.

1. This order shall dispose of a bunch of 8 petitions because common facts and questions of law are involved therein. However, the facts are being referred from CWP No. 12820 of 1999.

2. The Jullundur District Co-operative Agricultural Service Societies Employees Union (Regd.) [for brevity, `the Union] has filed the aforementioned petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the action of the respondents for restricting the payment of salary to the employees CWP No. 12820 of 1999 and connected petitions at 75% of the net profit of the Cooperative Agricultural Service Societies (for brevity, `the Society(s). The petitioner Union has sought quashing of letters dated 22.4.1999, 3.12.1998, 3.6.1999 and 18.5.1999 (P-7 to P-10) on the ground that the service conditions regarding grant of pay-scales and other service benefits of the employees working in the Society(s) in the State of Punjab have been changed in an illegal, arbitrary and mala fide manner, which is contrary to the Punjab State Co-operative Agricultural Service Societies Service Rules, 1997 (for brevity, `the 1997 Rules). Further a mandamus has been sought directing the respondents to allow the employees of the Society(s) to continue to draw the regular pay-scale and other benefits as provided by the Rules.

3. Broadly speaking the Society(s) in the State of Punjab, have employed primarily the following categories of employees - (a) Secretary; (b) Salesmen/Cashier; and (c) Peon-cum-Chowkidar. These employees are being paid salaries and other allowances by the respective Society(s) and there is no financial liability on the State exchequer. Their main function is to provide Fertilizers, Pesticides etc. as also to advance loans to the farmers and in turn they get marginal commission/interest. In other words, the commission and interest is the main source of income of these Society(s) out of which the employees are paid salaries.

4. Under Rule 28 of the Punjab State Co-operative Societies Rules, 1963 (for brevity, `the 1963 Rules), the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Punjab- respondent No. 2 has been empowered to frame Rules regarding qualifications and conditions of service of the employees of the Society(s). In exercise of the said power, respondent No. 2 initially framed the Rules, known as `the Punjab State Co-operative Agricultural Service Society Service Rules, 1979 (for brevity, `the 1979 Rules), which were notified on 29.5.1979. Rule 3 and 5 of the 1979 Rules deals with the strength of service and scales of pay.

5. On 17.11.1986, the Registrar-respondent No. 2 notified the Rules, known as `the Punjab State Co-operative Agricultural Service Societies Service Rules, 1986 (for brevity, `the 1986 Rules), which came into force w.e.f. 18.11.1986. Rule 7 of the 1986 Rules prescribed the pattern of staffing, emoluments and incentives in the Society(s). Annexure A to Rule 7 of the 1986 Rules further prescribes the scales of pay.

6. The Registrar-respondent No. 2 constituted a Committee under the chairmanship of Additional Registrar (Credit), Co-operative Societies, Punjab, to review the Service Rules of the employees of the Society(s). On the basis of the report submitted by the said Committee and in exercise of the power under Rule 28 of the 1963 Rules, the Service Rules of the employees of the Society(s) were reframed by the Registrar-respondent No. 2 and the 1986 Rules were repealed by the 1997 Rules w.e.f. 9.10.1997. As per Rule 7 of the 1997 Rules, which deals with the pattern of staffing, emoluments and incentives, members of the service are required to be paid dearness allowance and all other allowances on the pattern of the State Government. Rule 7 along with Annexure A of the 1997 Rules reads thus :-

"7. PATTERN OF STAFFING, EMOLUMENTS, AND INCENTIVES : i) The categories of the societies on functional basis, staff strength approved for them and scales of pay of each category of the employees shall be as per Annexure "A" to this
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top