SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2732

RAM CHAND GUPTA
Satish – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Ram Chand Gupta, J.

1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of impugned order, Annexure P1, and for issuance of direction to the respondents to allow four weeks parole to the petitioner to repair his ancestral house under Section 3(1)(d) of the Haryana Good Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1988 , (hereinafter to be referred as the `Act).

2. Reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents-State.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the whole record carefully.

4. Petitioner is undergoing ten years rigorous imprisonment in FIR No. 189, dated 29.8.1999, under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, registered at Police Station Gohana, and to pay a fine of Rs. 1 lac and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. He was convicted by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonepat, vide judgment dated 20.10.2000. Appeal against the said judgment was also dismissed by this Court. He remained undertrial in the said case from 16.10.2000 to 19.10.2000 and readmitted in the jail on 19.12.20




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top