SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2585

ALOK SINGH
Sudhir Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kuldip Singh Malhotra – Respondent


Judgment

Alok Singh, J.

1. Tenant petitioner has invoked revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 15 (5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), challenging the judgment / order dated 01.10.2009 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana, as well as judgment / order dated 07.01.2010 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Ludhiana.

2. The brief facts of the present case are that the landlord respondent has filed eviction petition against the tenant petitioner herein on the ground of arrears of rent contending that tenant is in arrears of rent w.e.f. 01.03.1997 at the rate of Rs. 1920/- per month and at the rate of Rs. 2304/- w.e.f. 1.3.2000.

3. Learned Rent Controller vide order dated 10.09.2009, assessed the provisional rent and directed the tenant to pay Rs. 3,62,259/- on or before adjourned date 01.10.2009. Order dated 10.09.2009 was challenged by way of revision being C.R. No. 5521 of 2009 before this Court, which was directed to be dismissed by this Court vide order dated 25.09.2009. However, liberty was granted to the tenant to approach the Rent Controller for extension of time to tender the arrears of rent,
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top