Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

1. The petitioner has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to challenge the impugned order dated 26.02.2010 (Annexure P-7) passed by the District Judge, Sangrur upholding the maintainability of the execution application filed by the respondent who has sought to execute foreign judgments (judgments of the Courts at United Kingdom) at Sangrur in India.

2. In order to trace the genesis of controversy between the parties to the dispute [hereinafter referred to as "the parties"] a few skeletal facts are necessary, namely, what was the basic dispute between the parties and what were the judgments and decrees passed by the Courts at United Kingdom.

3. Litigation between the parties at United Kingdom - The petitioner (Karnail Singh Sandhar) filed a Claim No.7BM30125 against

i) Sandhar & Kang Limited;

ii) Swarn Singh Kang;

iii) Udham Singh Kang; and

iv) Avtar Singh Kang in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Birmingham District Registry, United Kingdom [hereinafter referred to as the "High Court of Justice"] on 23.03.2007, inter alia, alleging that the petitioner was formerly a resident of Un