Mahesh Grover, J.

1. This is a tenants petition directed against the order of the Appellate Authority, Karnal dated 30.7.2010 vide which the petitioner has been ordered to be evicted from the demised premises.

2. The respondent-landlord preferred a petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking eviction of the petitioner on the grounds of bona fide necessity, non-payment of rent and creating nuisance. The petitioner denied all the averments made in the petition and controverted the allegations that he hlad not paid the rent and that he is creating nuisance.

3. The Rent Controller after framing the following issues appraised the entire evidence before it and concluded that the petition was liable to be rejected and ordered accordingly:-

1. Whether the respondent is liable to be ejected from the demised premises on the grounds mentioned in the petition?OPP

2. Whether this court has no jurisdiction to try and entertain the present petition? OPR

3. Whether the petition has not been properly valued for the purposes of court fee and jurisdiction?OPR

4. Relief.

4. In appeal, the Appellate Authori