SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2438

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Amar Ujala Publications – Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Prashar – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

1. The petitioner has challenged order dated 05.11.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muktsar by which application filed by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [for short "CPC"] for amendment of the written statement, has been dismissed.

2. In brief, respondent No.l (plaintiff) filed a suit claiming damages to the tune of Rs.10 lacs for a malicious publication of a news in the newspaper Amar Ujala (petitioner) dated 11.02.2004. A joint written statement was filed by defendant No.2 and the petitioner (defendant No.3) in which no preliminary objection was taken and averments made in the plaint were replied on merits alone. Issues were framed on 29.05.2007 by the learned Trial Court. The plaintiff closed his evidence on 20.01.2009 and the case was posted for evidence of the defendants for 12.02.2009. Thereafter, the case was adjourned on many dates. Then on 25.08.2009, an application was field by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the written statement which was dismissed by the learned Trial Court on 05.11.2009. It is also pertinent to mention at this stage





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top