RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Amar Ujala Publications – Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Prashar – Respondent
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.
1. The petitioner has challenged order dated 05.11.2009 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Muktsar by which application filed by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [for short "CPC"] for amendment of the written statement, has been dismissed.
2. In brief, respondent No.l (plaintiff) filed a suit claiming damages to the tune of Rs.10 lacs for a malicious publication of a news in the newspaper Amar Ujala (petitioner) dated 11.02.2004. A joint written statement was filed by defendant No.2 and the petitioner (defendant No.3) in which no preliminary objection was taken and averments made in the plaint were replied on merits alone. Issues were framed on 29.05.2007 by the learned Trial Court. The plaintiff closed his evidence on 20.01.2009 and the case was posted for evidence of the defendants for 12.02.2009. Thereafter, the case was adjourned on many dates. Then on 25.08.2009, an application was field by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the written statement which was dismissed by the learned Trial Court on 05.11.2009. It is also pertinent to mention at this stage
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.