SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2401

ALOK SINGH
Balbir Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Roop Lal – Respondent


Judgment

Alok Singh, J.

1. Landlords have invoked revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 25(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the "1949 Act"), challenging the order dated 17.9.2005 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, as-well as judgment/order dated 20.4.2010 passed by the Appellate Authority under the Rent Act, Chandigarh.

2. Brief facts of the present case are that landlords preferred eviction petition against the tenant on the ground, inter-alia, that tenant-respondent is occupying demise premises situated on the ground floor of SCO Nos. 102-02-03, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh on a monthly rent of Rs.3000/- per month in addition to electricity charges. Due to liberalization of the policies by Government of India, since 1991, rebate/incentives are given to the NRIs, the petitioners decided to set up a departmental store of world repute to give latest modern items to the residents of Chandigarh and the petitioners have decided to start the business in the entire building comprised of six floors including the ground floor and basement. Petitioners No.3 and 4 are engaged in business in Singapore, Europe, Australia, Canada
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top