ALOK SINGH
Balbir Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Roop Lal – Respondent
Alok Singh, J.
1. Landlords have invoked revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 25(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the "1949 Act"), challenging the order dated 17.9.2005 passed by the Rent Controller, Chandigarh, as-well as judgment/order dated 20.4.2010 passed by the Appellate Authority under the Rent Act, Chandigarh.
2. Brief facts of the present case are that landlords preferred eviction petition against the tenant on the ground, inter-alia, that tenant-respondent is occupying demise premises situated on the ground floor of SCO Nos. 102-02-03, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh on a monthly rent of Rs.3000/- per month in addition to electricity charges. Due to liberalization of the policies by Government of India, since 1991, rebate/incentives are given to the NRIs, the petitioners decided to set up a departmental store of world repute to give latest modern items to the residents of Chandigarh and the petitioners have decided to start the business in the entire building comprised of six floors including the ground floor and basement. Petitioners No.3 and 4 are engaged in business in Singapore, Europe, Australia, Canada
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.