SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2336

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Dayal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Hira Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

1. The petitioner has challenged order of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Chandigarh dated 11.05.2000 and order of Additional District Judge, Chandigarh dated 09.01.2002 by which a petition filed by respondent Hira Singh under.Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short "the Act") for issuance of succession certificate in respect of the estate of Labh Singh son of Roor Singh has been allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Roor Singh had two sons namely Hira Singh (respondent), Labha Singh and two daughters namely Bachan Kaur and Gurdial Kaur. The petitioner is the son of Gurdial Kaur. The dispute is with regard to the estate of Labh Singh who died intestate and issueless. After the death of Labh Singh, his brother Hira Singh (respondent) filed a petition under Section 372 of the Act seeking the issuance of succession certificate in respect of the estate of Labh Singh (deceased). In the said petition, the respondent had alleged that:-

"3. The family or other near relation The deceased was unmarried and died issueless, of the deceased & their respective There is no other relation of the deceased except residence No. the petitioner bein






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top