SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2367

ALOK SINGH
Suresh Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Singhal – Respondent


Judgment

Alok Singh, J.

1. In the present petition, defended - petitioner has invoked jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 16.11.2006 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chandigarh, whereby the trial Court has held that the suit filed by the plaintiff - respondent is not barred by Order 2 Rule 2 CPC.

2. Brief facts of the present case are that an agreement to sell was executed between the parties on 25.1.1988. In the agreement to sell, following terms and conditions were settled between the parties: -

"i) That the sale price of the above said house has been fixed as Rs. 18,50,000 (Rupees Eighteen lacs fifty thousand only).

ii) That the above said purchaser has paid a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) i.e. Rs.25,000/- vide cheque No.247019 dated 25.1.1988 payable at Canara Bank, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh and Rs.25,000/- vide cheque No.247021 dated 25.1.1988 and the above said seller acknowledges its receipt.

iii) That the last date for completion of the bargain has been fixed as 25.6.1988, which can be mutually extended with the consent of both the parties, if necessary.

iv) That the price of the abov































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top