SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2248

K.KANNAN
United India Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Parlad Rai – Respondent


Judgment

K.Kannan, J.

1. The Insurance Company is in appeal on the issue of quantum on the ground that the claim by the parents-in-law for of the death of daughter-in-law is not maintainable. The claimants son had also died in the accident which had been subject of an independent claim.

2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the parents-in-law could not be said to be dependents on the deceased and, therefore, the petition itself is not maintainable. It must be noticed that under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, in the absence of children and husband, on the death of a female, heirs of thehusband shall be the legal heirs. The father and mother are the heirs of the husband and, therefore, they shall be taken as legal heirs. The maintainability of the petition cannot therefore be doubted.

3. The extent of dependence may probably vary and it may not normally happen that the parents-in-law could be stated to be dependents on the daughter-in- law. However, it ought to make a difference in a case where the son of the claimants has also died. In an ordinary Indian social setting, a daughter-in- law moves into the family of her husband and takes care of th






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top