SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2285

L.N.MITTAL
Jora Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lakhwinder Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

L.N.Mittal, J.

1. This is second appeal by defendant Jora Singh, having remained unsuccessful in both the courts below.

2. The suit was filed by Inderjit Singh (since deceased and now represented by respondents as his legal representatives) alleging that the defendant- appellant agreed to sell the suit land measuring 18 bighas 09 biswas to the plaintiff @ Rs. 42,000/- per bigha, vide agreement dated 13.11.2002 and received Rs. 4,00,000/- as earnest money. Sale deed was to be executed on or before 30.11.2003. However, 29.11.2003 and 30.11.2003 being holidays (Saturday and Sunday), the plaintiff appeared before the Sub R.S.A. No. 597 of 2010 2 Registrar on 28.11.2003 for getting the sale deed executed in terms of agreement, but the defendant did not turn up. Notice sent to the defendant was received back undelivered. The defendant has committed breach of the agreement, whereas the plaintiff always remained ready and willing to perform his part of the contract. On these averments, the plaintiff sought specific performance of the agreement to sell and in the alternative, for recovery of Rs. 7,74,900/-.

3. The defendant denied the plaint allegations. The defendant also denied to







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top