SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2227

ALOK SINGH
Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Budhamal – Respondent


Judgment

Alok Singh, J.

1. Tenant - petitioner has filed present petition under Section 15 (5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the 1949 Act), challenging the order dated 20.5.2009 passed by the Rent Controller as well as the order dated 29.10.2009 passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby the eviction petition filed by the landlord respondent herein was allowed and eviction of the petitioner tenant was in decreed on the ground of personal bonafide requirement of the landlord respondent.

2. Brief facts of the present case are that the landlord respondent has filed petition under Section 13 of the Act for the ejectment of the tenant from the shop situated in Ghatti Bazar, at Patti, District District Amritsar now at Tarn Taran, initially on three grounds (i) non-payment of arrears of rent; (ii) tenant has not maintained the shop in question as well as its furniture and has decreased the utility of the shop; and (iii) the landlord requires the shop in question for his personal bonafide necessity.

3. The Rent Controller did not agree with the plaintiff on two grounds i.e. the tenant has decreased the utility of the shop and he is arrears o









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top