SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2163

K.C.PURI
Santosh Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Krishan Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

K.C.Puri, J.

1. This is an appeal directed by plaintiffs against the judgment dated 9.10.2006 passed by Sh. S.S. Lamba, Additional District Judge, Rohtak, vide which the appeal preferred by the plaintiff-appellants against judgment dated 10.6.2005 passed by Sh.H.S. Dahiya, Civil Judge (Senior Division), Rohtak, was dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction with the allegation that plaintiff No. 1 is the mother and plaintiff No.2 is her son. They jointly owned and possessed = share in the suit land. Jagdish Kumar, another son and Smt. Saroj Bala, daughter of plaintiff No. 1 owned and possessed the other = share in the suit land. On 7.11.1997, on obtaining a certified copy of jamabandi for the suit land, the plaintiffs were shocked to note that their share in the suit land stood transferred allegedly through sale to one Krishan Kumar son of Gowardhan Singh r/o V. Mokhra, Tehsil Meham (defendant No.1). The plaintiff immediately obtained a certified copy of alleged sham and bogus sale deed, allegedly executed and registered on 1.1.1992 vide which the 1/2 share in the total suit land belonging to plaintiffs is pur




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top