SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 2021

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Radhey Sham – Appellant
Versus
Sat Pal – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

1. Plaintiffs have filed this revision petition against the order of Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division), Amloh, dated 16.9.2010 by which an application filed by them for striking off defence of the defendants for not filing the written statement within 30 days as provided under Order 8 rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, CPC) has been dismissed.

2. Plaintiffs filed a suit for partition in which the defendants were allegedly served on 30.1.2006. They filed an application on 21.7.2006 for striking off defence of the defendants in not filing the written statement within 30 days much-less 90 days as provided under Order 8 Rule 1 of the CPC.

3. The application was contested by the defendants by way of reply dated 23.8.2006 in which it was alleged that they have not adopted any dilatory tactics by not filing the written statement because they had already filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of plaint which was not decided.

4. The trial Court, vide its impugned order, observed that the defendants were bonafidely pursing their application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC which was decided on the same date i.e.






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top