SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1931

ALOK SINGH
Ranbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Alok Singh, J.

1. By way of present petition, petitioner is impugning order dated 28.4.2010 passed by the Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Urban Local Bodies Department, under Section 252(2)/253 of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 1973 Act) and further impugning proceedings of meeting held on 7.1.2010.

2. Brief facts of the present case are that petitioner was elected as Member of the municipal Committee, Beri, District Jhajjar. 1/3rd members of the Municipal committee submitted requisition to the Deputy Commissioner for No- confidence Motion against the petitioner. A notice dated 4.12.2009 was issued thereby fixing 17.12.2009 to convene a meeting at 11.00 AM in the office of SDO (Civil) Beri (Annexure P-1). Petitioner filed civil suit challenging notice dated 4.12.2009 on the ground that the notice is illegal. As per the mandate of law, 15 days notice ought to have been issued. The Civil Court vide order dated 16.12.2009 (Annexure P-5) by observing that the notice dated 4.12.2009 is bad in law and is against Rule 72-A of the Haryana Municipal Election Rules, issued injunction not to convene a meeting pu








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top