SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1631

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Rameshwar Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Through General Manager, northern Railway – Respondent


Judgment

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J.

1. This order shall dispose of the three appeals bearing F.A.O. No. 1262 of 2010 (Rameshwar Lal v. Union of India); F.A.O. No. 1263 of 2010 (Veena Kumari v. Union of India) and F.A.O. No. 2057 of 2010 (Som Parkash v. Union of India) as questions involved in these appeals are similar because the appellants in all the three appeals have prayed for release of the amount of compensation awarded in their favour which has been ordered to be deposited by the Claims Tribunal in fixed deposit in some nationalised bank.

2. In F.A.O. No. 1262 of 2010 (Rameshwar Lal v. Union of India), claim petition was filed by husband and sons of Sushila Devi (since deceased) who had died in an untoward incident occurred on 16.9.2008. The Railway Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter for short, the Tribunal) allowed the claim petition vide its order dated 15.2.2010 and awarded Rs. 4,00,000 along with interest at the rate of 6 per cent to claimants from the date of filing of claim application, i.e., 30.12.2008 till the date of the award and further at the rate of 9 per cent per annum from the date of award till its realization. Out of the total award, an amo










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top