SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1662

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, JORA SINGH
Didar Singh @ Dara – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. Appellant Didar Singh has filed this appeal against the judgment dated 25.10.2006 passed by the Judge, Special Court, Amritsar, whereby he has been convicted under Section 18 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 12 years and to pay a fine of Rs. one lac and in default whereof, he shall further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.

2. As per the prosecution version, on 7.2.2004 at 5.00 p.m. SI Vishwa Mitter, Incharge, CIA Staff, along with other police officials, was present in the government gypsy at the bridge of canal Sultanwind, Amritsar, in connection with patrolling and in search of bad elements. There he received a secret information through a special informer that appellant Didar Singh, whose house was situated behind Police Station, Sultanwind, was indulging in selling of opium at large scale, and if a raid was conducted, he could be apprehended red handed and opium in heavy quantity could be recovered. On rving the said information, the police party went towards the house of the appellant and on the wa






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top