L.N.Mittal, J.

1. Appellant has filed this application for placing on record documents Annexure A/1 and A/2. However, in second appeal documents cannot be placed on record like this. No case or prayer for leading additional evidence has been made. The application is completely misconceived. Otherwise also the proposed additional evidence is irrelevant because the same is sought to be produced to depict that Pritam Singh testator used to affix signatures. However, this plea would be discussed in the judgment while disposing the main appeal. The instant application is misconceived and is without any merit and is dismissed. R.S.A. No.284 of 2007

2. This is second appeal by Bhajan Singh alias Harbhajan Singh plaintiff No.2, after plaintiffs i.e. appellant and proforma respondent No. 15 Joginder Singh have remained unsuccessful in both the courts below.

3. Plaintiffs filed suit challenging Will dated 17.6.1997 allegedly executed by their father Pritam Singh in favour of their brother Gurdarshan Singh defendant No. 1. Various other reliefs were also claimed but the central controversy is regarding the aforesaid Will. The plaintiffs also alleged that their father Pritam Singh had