SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1255

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Commissioner Of C. Ex. , Chandigarh-i – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Engineering Works – Respondent


Judgment

Ashutosh Mohunta, J.

1. The Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal has submitted the statement of facts without framing the question law. However, after going through the statement of facts, the following question of law arises for adjudication by this Court :-

#28;Whether in the light of the private record which had been discovered during a raid, the Tribunal was right in holding that there was no positive evidence of clandestine production and removal of goods during the relevant period?#29;

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the revenue, we are of the considered view that even if some record recovered during the raid and corroborated by some supportable evidence holding that there was an attempt of clandestine production and removal of goods, then it is necessary to have the same positive evidence of clandestine production and removal of goods.

3. In view of the above, the question of law is answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top