SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(P&H) 1281

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ALOK SINGH
Phool Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Alok Singh, J.

1. By way of present appeal, the appellant is assailing order dated 19.1.2009 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court whereby dismissing the writ petition challenging the order of the Commissioner and the Financial Commissioner, disturbing the order of the Collector, whereby the petitioner was appointed as Lamberdar of the village.

2. Brief facts of the present case are that office of Lambardar of Village Mauza Chatia Aulia, Tehsil and District Sonepat, fell vacant on the death of the then Lambardar, Amar Dass. Applications were invited from all eligible and interested persons for appointment as Lambardar. Eight persons gave applications but except the petitioner and respondentNo. 4, remaining candidates withdrew their applications. The Collector, Sonepat after discussing the inter se merit of the petitioner and respondent No. 4, appointed the petitioner as Lambardar of the Village on 22.3.2007. Respondent No. 4 filed an appeal against the said order before the Commissioner, Ludhiana Division, Ludhiana. He set aside the order passed by the Collector and appointed respondentNo. 4 as Lambardar. The said order was challenged before the Financial Commissione











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top