SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1474

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, AJAY TEWARI
Commissioner Of Central Excise, Ludhiana – Appellant
Versus
Tee Sons Knitwears – Respondent


Judgment

1. The Revenue is aggrieved by order dated 8-8-2007 passed by Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Excise Appeal No. 2871 of 2005-SM(BR), dismissing the appeal of the Revenue on the issue of entitlement to deemed MODVAT credit.

2. The assessee is manufacturer of knitted garments and gave declaration on 2-5-2003 under Rule 9A of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, declaring the goods lying in stock as on 1-4-2003. Show cause notice dated 28-6- 2004 was issued by the adjudicating authority for recovery of central excise duty in respect of 200200 pieces of ready-made garments, which had not been entered in the record. The demand of duty was confirmed and penalty was imposed.

3. On appeal, the assessee pointed out that in the declaration, goods lying in the shop were also included. A photocopy of bank statement in support of this plea was also produced.

4. The appellate authority after recording its satisfaction on the factual aspect of the plea of the assessee, allowed the appeal, which order has been affirmed by the Tribunal.

5. Appeal before this Court under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, #28;the Act#29;) is maintainable only o










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top