SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1353

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, DAYA CHAUDHARY
Sukhdip Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL. J.

1. In this writ petition, the petitioner raised the question whether the election of Sarpanch of the gram Panchayat of Village Akoi Sahib, Tehsil and District Sangrur can be kept in abeyance till filling up of the casual vacancy of the Member, Gram Panchayat, which has occurred due to the death of one Member, after notification of the election of the Gram panchayat under Sec.13 of the Punjab panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ).

2. In this case, the State of Punjab vide gazette Notification dated 12.2.2008 issued under Sec.10 (2) of the Act constituted gram Sabha Akoi Sahib consisting of seven members. Subsequently, as per the election programme, the election for the office of panches was held in village Akoi Sahib on 26-5-2008. All seven Panches were duly elected as per the reservation. Thereafter, the said election was duly notified under Sec.13 of the Act. After the said notification, one elected Panch, namely, Harminder Singh, was murdered on 24-6-2008. Subsequently, the Deputy Commissioner in exercise of the powers under Sec.13-A of the Act authorised respondent No.4 to convene the meeting of the newly elected Panches f









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top