SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1288

RAJIVE BHALLA
Bhatia Cloth House – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Gupta – Respondent


Judgment

Rajive Bhalla, J.

1. The petitioner-tenant impugns an order, dated 11.2.2006, passed by the learned Rent Controller, Ambala City directing his ejectment, as also an order, dated 4.4.2007, passed by the learned Appellate Authority/Additional District Judge (Adhoc) Fast Track Court, Ambala, affirming the aforementioned order.

2. The respondents/landlords filed a petition, under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 for the petitioner-tenants ejectment from shop No. 377, B-4 Dev Samaj Road, Ambala City on the grounds of non payment of rent w.e.f. 1.4.2001 and the bona fide personal need of respondent No. 1-Dr. Raj Kumar Gupta. It was asserted in the petition for ejectment that the Haryana Urban Development Authority has served notices, under Section 17 of the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 , calling upon respondent No. 1 to close his clinic in House No. 792, Sector 7, Urban Estate Ambala City, as commercial activity is not permitted in residential premises. Respondent No. 1 is, therefore, required to shut down his clinic or face resumption of his house and it was, therefore, prayed that as respondent No. 1 requires the shop for h

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top