Harbans Lal, J.

1. This regular second appeal has been filed by Ram Phal and Anr. plaintiffs/appellant nor setting aside the impugned judgment/degree dated 26.2.2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sonepat as well as the judgment/decree dated 28.5.2008 rendered by the Court of learned Additional District Judge, Sonepat.

2. Learned Counsel for the appellants has strenuously urged that the courts below have gravely erred in rejecting the prayer of the appellants for granting one more opportunity to the plaintiffs/appellants to lead their entire evidence by giving a go by to the doctrine of interest of justice. He further contended that on 25.4.2006 the issues in this case were framed. The case was fixed for 12.6.2006 for evidence of the plaintiffs/appellants. Since no evidence was present on that day, the case was adjourned without any protest from other side to 3.10.2006 and then to 5.1.2007, which was declared as holiday and then it was fixed for 3.5.2007, 20.9.2007, 14.2.2008, 26.2.2008 for evidence of the plaintiffs/ appellants. It was on 26.2.2008 when the plaintiffs/appellants were sitting on the seat of their counsel, their case, was taken up and i