SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1086

RAJESH BINDAL, VIJENDER JAIN, M.M.KUMAR, JASBIR SINGH, RAJIVE BHALLA
Ram Chander – Appellant
Versus
Bhim Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Rajive Bhalla, J.

1. We are called upon, to resolve an apparent difference of opinion between the ratio of two Full Bench Judgments, namely, Lachhman Singh v. Pritam Chand (1970)72 P.L.R. 341 and Bhartu v. Ram Sarup 1981 P.L.J. 204, the former holding that purchase of land from a joint khewat by reference to specific kila/khasra numbers contained in specific rectangles would not confer the status of a co-sharer in the entire joint khewat upon the vendee and the latter holding to the contrary.

2. Before we proceed to answer the reference, it would be appropriate to briefly narrate the facts of the present case so as to place the entire controversy in its correct perspective.

Smt. Kitabo and Smt. Jagwanti were joint owners of agricultural land measuring 26 Kanals 11 marlas, bearing Khewat No. 78, Khatoni No. 127, Rectangle Nos. 30, 31, 32 and 1471. They sold land measuring 14 kanals 4 marlas to Bhim Singh, the plaintiff/respondent, from Khewat No. 78, Khatoni No. 127, Rectangle No. 30/6/2/2(3-6), 15/2/2(1-7), Rectangle No. 31/12/l(l-6), 19/2(2-4), Khatoni No. 129 and from Killa No. 31/12/2(6-1), pursuant to a registered sale deed, dated 30.12.1988. They thereafter sold land m



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top