SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1097

VINOD K.SHARMA
Sahun – Appellant
Versus
Asgari – Respondent


Judgment

Vinod K.Sharma, J.

1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been moved for quashing of order dated 8.7.2006 as well as order dated 11.2.2004 whereby the petitioner (Muslim husband) has been directed to pay maintenance to respondent No. 1 (Muslim divorced wife) as well as respondents Nos. 2 and 3 their children.

2. The contention of the learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the divorced Muslim wife is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. as the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 has been enacted so as to protect the right of Muslim Women who have been divorced by, or have obtained divorce from their husbands and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

3. This Court in the case of Sarban Ali V/s. Naziran Crl. Misc. No. 36399-M of 2003 decided on 30.4.2008 has been pleased to lay down that the only remedy with the divorced Muslim wife is to move an application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to claim maintenance as no maintenance can be granted to her under Section 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. The said decision is bas


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top