SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1048

VINOD K.SHARMA
Vanita Jhunthra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Vinod K.Sharma, J.

1. The petitioners by moving present under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have sought quashing of FIR No. 331 dated 16.5.2005, registered under Sections 304-A/34 IPC at police station City Sirsa and also consequential proceedings arising out of the FIR.

2. The allegations against the petitioners in the FIR are as under :-

"Stated that I reside on the address as stated above. I am doing the work of selling of milk to earn my livelihood. I was married about 15 years back to Kiran daughter of Mukand Lal Sethi r/o Ratia. No child was born from our wedlock. We received treatment for infertility from many doctors, unsuccessfully and no child was born. Today i.e. on 16.5.05, I came to Jhunthra Nursing Home along with my wife Kiran at about 12.30 p.m. I got my wife examined by Dr. Satish Jhunthra and Dr. Vinita Jhunthra who advised ultrasound examination of my wife. I had got the ultrasound examination done from Dr. Garg and showed the report to Dr. Satish Jhunthra. On examination the report, Dr. Satish Jhunthra said that he has the doubt of tubal blockage in Mrs. Kiran. I asked him to proceed as he wished. After this, I and my wife were made to si








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top