SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 1003

HEMANT GUPTA, MOHINDER PAL
Sunita Rani – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Mohinder Pal, J.

1. The prayer made in this petition is for quashing the order dated October 22, 2003 (Annexure P-11) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh (for short the Tribunal), vide which Original Application No. 94-HR of 2003 filed by petitioner Sunita Rani, who is widow of Vijay Kumar, a Class III employee in the office Garrison Engineer (North), M.E.S., Ambala Cantt (respondent No. 3), for medical reimbursement on account of post heart-surgery treatment she underwent in Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, (for short P.G.I.) has been dismissed and for issuing a direction to the respondents to make payment of the expenses incurred by her in this connection.

2. The petitioner was operated upon for heart surgery in P.G.I. on October 04, 1996. She was reimbursed the medical expenses for the same. It is pleaded that she was also being reimbursed the post surgery medical expenses till her husband was alive. Husband of the petitioner died on July 06, 2001. The petitioner requires regular medicines amounting to Rs. 1,500/- to Rs. 2,000/- per month. She submitted bills of her follow-up-treatment to the r






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top