SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 985

A.N.JINDAL
Harnek Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

1. This judgment shall dispose of Criminal Appeal No.21-SB of 1998 filed by the accused-appellants and Criminal Revision No.538 of 1998 filed by the complainant, having been arisen out of the judgment dated 20/22.12.1997 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ambala, vide which, though accused appellants Harnek Singh, Malkiat Singh and Darbara Singh @ Dara were tried under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, but were convicted and sentenced under Section 323/325 read with Section 34, IPC as under :-

Harnek Singh, Malkiat Singh and Darbara Singh @ Dara u/S. 323/34, IPC : To undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months each. u/S. 325/34, IPC : To undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs.500/- each. However, both the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2 In nutshell, the prosecution story is that the land of Surinder Singh injured-complainant and that of Gurnam Singh and others adjoins each other, therefore there remained always a dispute over the turn of water. On 30.7.1992, at about 9.30 a.m. when Surinder Singh was on his way to the fields, Malkiat Singh and Darbara Singh alias Dara came armed with lathies, attacked S















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top