Ranjit Singh, J.

1. The order impugned in the present revision petition is the one whereby prayer for amendment of the pleadings made by respondents under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC stands allowed.

2. Respondent Dewan Chand and Anr. filed a petition under Section 13(3)(ii) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act for eviction of tenant from their shop on the ground of bona fide necessity. The case set up by the petitioner was that husband and wife needed this shop for running their own business. On the basis of the pleadings, one of the issue that was framed was:

whether the petitioners require the demised shop for their use and occupation for business? OPA

This petition was instituted on 3.2.2000. In January, 2007 the present application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC was filed seeking amendment to the effect that youngest son of the petitioners, namely, Jaspal was an employee of M/s Khahna Book Depot and has started his business as a book seller and stationery after taking a shop on rent from one Harjinder Singh and joined Narinder Kumar, his elder brother as his assistant, Narinder Kumar wanted to set up his own business in the shop in question. He is of a marriageable age and