SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 901

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, S.D.ANAND
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

S.D.Anand, J.

1. Appellant Mukesh Kumar impugns the validity of his conviction, at the hands of the learned Trial Judge, on a charge under Section 302 IPC. The allegation is that, on being spurned by his lady love, the jilted lover in the appellant set her afire and also sustained burns in that process.

2. The deceased was wife of PW 2 Kamal Singh. The couple, along with their daughter were initially residing at Rohtak. From there, they shifted to village Patwapur. It is from there only that they shifted to village Sirhole where they occupied tenanted premises owned by PW 1 Amarjit Singh. Kamal Singh suspected that his wife (deceased Kanta) had illicit relations with appellant Mukesh Kumar. On the relevant date, PW 2 Kamal Singh was at his place of employment in Munzal Shora Factory at Gurgaon. Sometime, after about 5.30 PM, PW 1 Amarjeet Singh spotted deceased Kanta and also appellant Mukesh Kumar emerging out of the tenanted Chaubara while both of them were "in burnt condition". Appellant Mukesh jumped from the roof into the gallary on the ground floor. The fire on the person of Kanta was extinguished by PW 1 Amarjeet Singh "with the help of sand". Kamal Singh was summone






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top