SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 758

RAKESH KUMAR GARG, SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Bhupinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of Patiala – Respondent


Judgment

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.

1. The petitioner, who is a poor mason and had taken a small house loan of Rs. 4,80,000/- from the respondent Bank, has filed this writ petition challenging the action of the respondent-bank whereby the house for which the aforesaid loan was taken, has been sold in a fake auction in illegal, arbitrary and fraudulent manner by invoking the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The instant case is an example of unreasonableness and high handedness where the bank authorities have misused the provisions of the Act by selling the house of a poor borrower at a throw-away price in collusion among themselves.

2. In the present case, in April, 2003, the petitioner along with his wife had taken a loan of Rs. 4,80,000/- for the purchase of a double storey constructed house situated at Dashmesh Nagar, Patiala. The said house was constructed in an area of 133.3 sq. yards with a covered area of 1251 sq. ft. They had purchased that house for a consideration of Rs. 6,00,000/- vide registered sale deed dated 12-6-2003 from one Smt. Saroj Bala. They h






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top