SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(P&H) 756

NIRMAL YADAV
Harish Chand – Appellant
Versus
Rameshwar Dayal Mangla Alias Ramesh Chand – Respondent


Judgment

Nirmal Yadav, J.

1. This is plaintiffs regular second appeal directed against the judgment and decree dated 9.9.1985 passed by Additional District Judge (I), Faridkot whereby the judgment and decree dated 30.4.1981 passed by Sub Judge 1st Class, Palwal decreeing the suit of the plaintiff for mandatory injunction, has been reversed and suit of the plaintiff has been dismissed being not maintainable. The defendant has also filed Cross-Objection No. 25-C of 2006 impugning the findings of the 1st Appellate Court whereby verdict of the trial Court on issues No. 1, 2, 7 and 10 has been affirmed. Hence, both RSA No. 3067 of 1985 and Cross-Objection No. 25-C of 2006 are being decided by this common judgment.

2. The bone of contention between the parties is a three-storied house, as depicted in site-plan, Ex. P3. Appellants/plaintiffs filed a suit for mandatory injunction with a direction to respondent/defendant to vacate and handover the possession of the suit property. According to plaintiffs they were owners in possession of the suit property. In the year 1971, defendant-Rameshwar Dayal Mangla alias Ramesh Chand, who is their first cousin, approached them to allow him to occupy t

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top