Ranjit Singh, J.

1. Alleging that she was tricked by her husband, Ranjna has filed this first appeal impugning the decree of divorce granted by Addl.District Judge, Sonepat on the ground of mutual consent.

2. The facts, as noticeable from the brief order ending this matrimonial alliance, are that a petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act was filed for dissolving the marriage between the appellant and her husband Anil Kumar on the ground of mutual consent on 30.7.2004. On that very day, the statements of the husband and wife were recorded to the effect that due to their different temperaments, they could not adjust as husband and wife and then they accordingly had decided to dissolve their marriage. On an application filed, the case was again taken up on 21.8.2004 when this was put up before a Lok Adalat. The statements of parties were recorded on this date. It is seen from the statements that on request of both the parties, the file was put up before Lok Adalat where they again effected compromise. It is noticed that both the husband and wife made a statement that they were not able to adjust themselves as husband and wife due to different temperaments and there